Multi Page Application vs Static Site Generator

Developers should use MPAs for projects requiring strong SEO performance, as search engines can easily crawl static pages, and for applications with simple interactivity where full page reloads are acceptable meets developers should use a static site generator when building fast, secure, and scalable websites with predictable content, as it eliminates server-side rendering overhead and reduces vulnerabilities compared to dynamic sites. Here's our take.

Multi Page Application

Nice Pick

Developers should use MPAs for projects requiring strong SEO performance, as search engines can easily crawl static pages, and for applications with simple interactivity where full page reloads are acceptable

Pros

• They are ideal for content-heavy websites like blogs, e-commerce platforms, or corporate sites where server-side rendering ensures fast initial loads and compatibility with older browsers without JavaScript dependencies
• Related to: server-side-rendering, html

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Site Generator

Developers should use a Static Site Generator when building fast, secure, and scalable websites with predictable content, as it eliminates server-side rendering overhead and reduces vulnerabilities compared to dynamic sites

Pros

• It's ideal for projects like blogs, documentation, or landing pages where performance and simplicity are priorities, and it integrates well with modern workflows using version control and headless CMSs
• Related to: jamstack, markdown

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Multi Page Application is a concept while Static Site Generator is a tool. We picked Multi Page Application based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Multi Page Application wins

Based on overall popularity. Multi Page Application is more widely used, but Static Site Generator excels in its own space.