Multi Page Applications vs Static Site Generator

Developers should use MPAs for content-heavy websites like blogs, e-commerce platforms, or news sites where SEO is critical, as search engines can easily crawl static pages meets developers should use static site generators for content-heavy websites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing sites where content changes infrequently. Here's our take.

Multi Page Applications

Nice Pick

Developers should use MPAs for content-heavy websites like blogs, e-commerce platforms, or news sites where SEO is critical, as search engines can easily crawl static pages

Pros

• They are also suitable for applications requiring server-side rendering for performance or security, and when simplicity and broad browser compatibility are priorities without complex client-side JavaScript
• Related to: html, css

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Site Generator

Developers should use Static Site Generators for content-heavy websites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing sites where content changes infrequently

Pros

• They are ideal when performance, security, and low hosting costs are priorities, as static files reduce server load and vulnerabilities compared to dynamic server-rendered sites
• Related to: markdown, git

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Multi Page Applications is a concept while Static Site Generator is a tool. We picked Multi Page Applications based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Multi Page Applications wins

Based on overall popularity. Multi Page Applications is more widely used, but Static Site Generator excels in its own space.