Multi Page Websites vs Static Site Generator

Developers should use Multi Page Websites when building applications that require strong SEO performance, as each page can be individually indexed by search engines, or when the site has distinct, separate content sections that benefit from clear URL structures meets developers should use static site generators for content-heavy websites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing sites where content changes infrequently. Here's our take.

Multi Page Websites

Nice Pick

Developers should use Multi Page Websites when building applications that require strong SEO performance, as each page can be individually indexed by search engines, or when the site has distinct, separate content sections that benefit from clear URL structures

Pros

• This architecture is also ideal for projects where server-side processing is necessary for security or data handling, such as in e-commerce with payment gateways, or when targeting users with limited JavaScript support, like in certain accessibility or legacy browser scenarios
• Related to: html, css

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Site Generator

Developers should use Static Site Generators for content-heavy websites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing sites where content changes infrequently

Pros

• They are ideal when performance, security, and low hosting costs are priorities, as static files reduce server load and vulnerabilities compared to dynamic server-rendered sites
• Related to: markdown, git

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Multi Page Websites is a concept while Static Site Generator is a tool. We picked Multi Page Websites based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Multi Page Websites wins

Based on overall popularity. Multi Page Websites is more widely used, but Static Site Generator excels in its own space.