Multi-Version Concurrency Control vs Pessimistic Concurrency Control
Developers should learn MVCC when working with databases that require high concurrency, such as in web applications or distributed systems, as it prevents read-write conflicts and reduces locking overhead meets developers should use pessimistic concurrency control in high-conflict environments, such as financial systems or inventory management, where data integrity is critical and concurrent updates could lead to errors. Here's our take.
Multi-Version Concurrency Control
Developers should learn MVCC when working with databases that require high concurrency, such as in web applications or distributed systems, as it prevents read-write conflicts and reduces locking overhead
Multi-Version Concurrency Control
Nice PickDevelopers should learn MVCC when working with databases that require high concurrency, such as in web applications or distributed systems, as it prevents read-write conflicts and reduces locking overhead
Pros
- +It is essential for implementing snapshot isolation or Serializable Snapshot Isolation (SSI) in databases like PostgreSQL, Oracle, and MySQL (with InnoDB), ensuring consistent reads without blocking writes
- +Related to: database-concurrency, transaction-isolation
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Pessimistic Concurrency Control
Developers should use Pessimistic Concurrency Control in high-conflict environments, such as financial systems or inventory management, where data integrity is critical and concurrent updates could lead to errors
Pros
- +It is ideal for scenarios with long-running transactions or when strict consistency is required, as it prevents race conditions by serializing access to resources
- +Related to: optimistic-concurrency-control, database-transactions
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Multi-Version Concurrency Control if: You want it is essential for implementing snapshot isolation or serializable snapshot isolation (ssi) in databases like postgresql, oracle, and mysql (with innodb), ensuring consistent reads without blocking writes and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Pessimistic Concurrency Control if: You prioritize it is ideal for scenarios with long-running transactions or when strict consistency is required, as it prevents race conditions by serializing access to resources over what Multi-Version Concurrency Control offers.
Developers should learn MVCC when working with databases that require high concurrency, such as in web applications or distributed systems, as it prevents read-write conflicts and reduces locking overhead
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev