Mup vs PM2

Developers should use Mup when deploying Meteor meets developers should use pm2 when deploying node. Here's our take.

Mup

Nice Pick

Developers should use Mup when deploying Meteor

Pros

• js applications to production servers, as it simplifies the deployment workflow and reduces manual configuration errors
• Related to: meteor-js, node-js

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

PM2

Developers should use PM2 when deploying Node

Pros

• js applications to production servers to ensure high availability, manage multiple instances for load balancing, and simplify application lifecycle management
• Related to: node-js, javascript

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Mup if: You want js applications to production servers, as it simplifies the deployment workflow and reduces manual configuration errors and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use PM2 if: You prioritize js applications to production servers to ensure high availability, manage multiple instances for load balancing, and simplify application lifecycle management over what Mup offers.

The Bottom Line

Mup wins

Developers should use Mup when deploying Meteor