Dynamic

MVVM vs MVP

Developers should learn MVVM when building complex, data-driven applications where UI and business logic need to be decoupled, such as in desktop, mobile, or web apps using frameworks that support data binding meets developers should learn and use mvp when building new software products or features to validate assumptions quickly and efficiently, especially in startups or innovative projects where resources are limited. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

MVVM

Developers should learn MVVM when building complex, data-driven applications where UI and business logic need to be decoupled, such as in desktop, mobile, or web apps using frameworks that support data binding

MVVM

Nice Pick

Developers should learn MVVM when building complex, data-driven applications where UI and business logic need to be decoupled, such as in desktop, mobile, or web apps using frameworks that support data binding

Pros

  • +It is especially useful for scenarios requiring unit testing of UI logic without UI dependencies, as the ViewModel can be tested independently
  • +Related to: data-binding, wpf

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

MVP

Developers should learn and use MVP when building new software products or features to validate assumptions quickly and efficiently, especially in startups or innovative projects where resources are limited

Pros

  • +It helps prioritize core functionalities, avoid over-engineering, and adapt to user needs early in the development cycle, reducing the risk of building products that fail in the market
  • +Related to: agile-development, lean-startup

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. MVVM is a concept while MVP is a methodology. We picked MVVM based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
MVVM wins

Based on overall popularity. MVVM is more widely used, but MVP excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev