Named Inner Classes vs Anonymous Inner Classes
Developers should use named inner classes when they need to create helper classes that are tightly coupled to an outer class but require a distinct identity for reuse or clarity meets developers should learn anonymous inner classes when working with java, particularly in gui applications (e. Here's our take.
Named Inner Classes
Developers should use named inner classes when they need to create helper classes that are tightly coupled to an outer class but require a distinct identity for reuse or clarity
Named Inner Classes
Nice PickDevelopers should use named inner classes when they need to create helper classes that are tightly coupled to an outer class but require a distinct identity for reuse or clarity
Pros
- +Specific use cases include implementing event listeners, creating specialized data structures (e
- +Related to: java, object-oriented-programming
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Anonymous Inner Classes
Developers should learn anonymous inner classes when working with Java, particularly in GUI applications (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: java, lambda-expressions
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Named Inner Classes if: You want specific use cases include implementing event listeners, creating specialized data structures (e and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Anonymous Inner Classes if: You prioritize g over what Named Inner Classes offers.
Developers should use named inner classes when they need to create helper classes that are tightly coupled to an outer class but require a distinct identity for reuse or clarity
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev