Native Code vs WebAssembly

Developers should learn and use native code when building performance-critical applications such as operating systems, game engines, embedded systems, or high-frequency trading software, where low latency and efficient resource utilization are essential meets developers should learn webassembly when building performance-critical web applications, such as games, video editing tools, or scientific simulations, where javascript may be too slow. Here's our take.

Native Code

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use native code when building performance-critical applications such as operating systems, game engines, embedded systems, or high-frequency trading software, where low latency and efficient resource utilization are essential

Pros

• It is also crucial for scenarios requiring direct hardware interaction, like device drivers or real-time systems, as it provides fine-grained control over memory and processor instructions
• Related to: c, c-plus-plus

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

WebAssembly

Developers should learn WebAssembly when building performance-critical web applications, such as games, video editing tools, or scientific simulations, where JavaScript may be too slow

Pros

• It's also useful for porting existing codebases from languages like C++ to the web without rewriting them in JavaScript
• Related to: javascript, rust

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Native Code is a concept while WebAssembly is a platform. We picked Native Code based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Native Code wins

Based on overall popularity. Native Code is more widely used, but WebAssembly excels in its own space.