Native Image vs OpenJDK

Developers should learn and use Native Image when they need to deploy Java applications in environments with strict resource constraints or where rapid startup is essential, such as serverless functions (e meets developers should learn and use openjdk when building or deploying java applications that require a reliable, open-source, and community-supported java runtime. Here's our take.

Native Image

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Native Image when they need to deploy Java applications in environments with strict resource constraints or where rapid startup is essential, such as serverless functions (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: graalvm, java

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

OpenJDK

Developers should learn and use OpenJDK when building or deploying Java applications that require a reliable, open-source, and community-supported Java runtime

Pros

• It is essential for environments prioritizing cost-effectiveness, transparency, and compatibility with the latest Java specifications, such as enterprise servers, cloud-native applications, and development tools
• Related to: java, java-virtual-machine

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Native Image is a tool while OpenJDK is a platform. We picked Native Image based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Native Image wins

Based on overall popularity. Native Image is more widely used, but OpenJDK excels in its own space.