Dynamic
Neon vs Azure Database for MySQL
Serverless Postgres with branching meets mysql with a microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Neon
Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.
Neon
Nice PickServerless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.
Pros
- +Serverless Postgres
- +Branching
- +Generous free tier
- +Scale to zero
Cons
- -Newer
- -Cold starts
- -Smaller community
Azure Database for MySQL
MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.
Pros
- +Fully managed with automated backups and patching
- +High availability built-in with flexible server options
- +Seamless integration with other Azure services
- +Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules
Cons
- -Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
- -Limited control over underlying infrastructure
The Verdict
Use Neon if: You want serverless postgres and can live with newer.
Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and patching over what Neon offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Neon wins
Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev