Dynamic

Neon vs Azure Database for MySQL

Serverless Postgres with branching meets mysql with a microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Neon

Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.

Neon

Nice Pick

Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.

Pros

  • +Serverless Postgres
  • +Branching
  • +Generous free tier
  • +Scale to zero

Cons

  • -Newer
  • -Cold starts
  • -Smaller community

Azure Database for MySQL

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.

Pros

  • +Fully managed with automated backups and patching
  • +High availability built-in with flexible server options
  • +Seamless integration with other Azure services
  • +Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules

Cons

  • -Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
  • -Limited control over underlying infrastructure

The Verdict

Use Neon if: You want serverless postgres and can live with newer.

Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and patching over what Neon offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Neon wins

Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev