Dynamic
Neon vs Azure SQL Database
Serverless Postgres with branching meets sql server's cloud-bound cousin. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Neon
Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.
Neon
Nice PickServerless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.
Pros
- +Serverless Postgres
- +Branching
- +Generous free tier
- +Scale to zero
Cons
- -Newer
- -Cold starts
- -Smaller community
Azure SQL Database
SQL Server's cloud-bound cousin. All the enterprise-grade features, none of the hardware headaches.
Pros
- +Fully managed with automated backups and high availability
- +Built-in intelligence for performance tuning and security
- +Supports serverless compute and Hyperscale for massive scalability
Cons
- -Can get pricey for high-performance workloads
- -Limited to Microsoft SQL Server compatibility
The Verdict
Use Neon if: You want serverless postgres and can live with newer.
Use Azure SQL Database if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and high availability over what Neon offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Neon wins
Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev