Dynamic

Neon vs Azure SQL Database

Serverless Postgres with branching meets sql server's cloud-bound cousin. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Neon

Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.

Neon

Nice Pick

Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.

Pros

  • +Serverless Postgres
  • +Branching
  • +Generous free tier
  • +Scale to zero

Cons

  • -Newer
  • -Cold starts
  • -Smaller community

Azure SQL Database

SQL Server's cloud-bound cousin. All the enterprise-grade features, none of the hardware headaches.

Pros

  • +Fully managed with automated backups and high availability
  • +Built-in intelligence for performance tuning and security
  • +Supports serverless compute and Hyperscale for massive scalability

Cons

  • -Can get pricey for high-performance workloads
  • -Limited to Microsoft SQL Server compatibility

The Verdict

Use Neon if: You want serverless postgres and can live with newer.

Use Azure SQL Database if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and high availability over what Neon offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Neon wins

Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev