Dynamic

Neon vs CockroachDB

Serverless Postgres with branching meets the cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at sql. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Neon

Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.

Neon

Nice Pick

Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.

Pros

  • +Serverless Postgres
  • +Branching
  • +Generous free tier
  • +Scale to zero

Cons

  • -Newer
  • -Cold starts
  • -Smaller community

CockroachDB

The cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at SQL.

Pros

  • +Strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding
  • +PostgreSQL wire protocol compatibility for easy migration
  • +Automatic data replication and rebalancing for high availability

Cons

  • -Higher latency compared to single-node databases due to distributed overhead
  • -Complex licensing and pricing can be a headache for scaling

The Verdict

Use Neon if: You want serverless postgres and can live with newer.

Use CockroachDB if: You prioritize strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding over what Neon offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Neon wins

Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev