Dynamic
Neon vs CockroachDB
Serverless Postgres with branching meets the cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at sql. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Neon
Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.
Neon
Nice PickServerless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.
Pros
- +Serverless Postgres
- +Branching
- +Generous free tier
- +Scale to zero
Cons
- -Newer
- -Cold starts
- -Smaller community
CockroachDB
The cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at SQL.
Pros
- +Strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding
- +PostgreSQL wire protocol compatibility for easy migration
- +Automatic data replication and rebalancing for high availability
Cons
- -Higher latency compared to single-node databases due to distributed overhead
- -Complex licensing and pricing can be a headache for scaling
The Verdict
Use Neon if: You want serverless postgres and can live with newer.
Use CockroachDB if: You prioritize strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding over what Neon offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Neon wins
Serverless Postgres with branching. PlanetScale vibes, Postgres reality.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev