Network Monitoring vs Application Performance Monitoring

Developers should learn network monitoring to troubleshoot application performance issues, ensure service availability, and enhance security in distributed systems meets developers should learn and use apm to proactively detect and resolve performance issues before they impact users, especially in microservices or cloud-native architectures where complexity can obscure root causes. Here's our take.

Network Monitoring

Nice Pick

Developers should learn network monitoring to troubleshoot application performance issues, ensure service availability, and enhance security in distributed systems

Pros

• It is crucial for DevOps and SRE roles to maintain uptime, debug network-related bugs, and comply with SLAs in cloud or on-premise environments
• Related to: snmp, netflow

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Application Performance Monitoring

Developers should learn and use APM to proactively detect and resolve performance issues before they impact users, especially in microservices or cloud-native architectures where complexity can obscure root causes

Pros

• It is critical for maintaining service-level agreements (SLAs), optimizing resource usage, and improving user satisfaction in production environments
• Related to: observability, distributed-tracing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Network Monitoring is a concept while Application Performance Monitoring is a tool. We picked Network Monitoring based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Network Monitoring wins

Based on overall popularity. Network Monitoring is more widely used, but Application Performance Monitoring excels in its own space.