Dynamic
Ninject vs StructureMap
Developers should learn Ninject when building meets developers should learn structuremap when working on legacy . Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Ninject
Developers should learn Ninject when building
Ninject
Nice PickDevelopers should learn Ninject when building
Pros
- +NET applications that require maintainable, testable code through dependency injection, such as in enterprise-level web services, desktop applications, or complex business logic systems
- +Related to: dependency-injection, inversion-of-control
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
StructureMap
Developers should learn StructureMap when working on legacy
Pros
- +NET projects (especially
- +Related to: dependency-injection, inversion-of-control
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Ninject if: You want net applications that require maintainable, testable code through dependency injection, such as in enterprise-level web services, desktop applications, or complex business logic systems and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use StructureMap if: You prioritize net projects (especially over what Ninject offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Ninject wins
Developers should learn Ninject when building
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev