No Estimation vs Planning Poker

Developers should consider No Estimation when working in fast-paced, uncertain environments where requirements change frequently, as it reduces overhead and stress associated with estimation meets developers should use planning poker during sprint planning or backlog refinement sessions to improve estimation accuracy and team alignment. Here's our take.

No Estimation

Nice Pick

Developers should consider No Estimation when working in fast-paced, uncertain environments where requirements change frequently, as it reduces overhead and stress associated with estimation

Pros

• It is particularly useful in Kanban or Lean contexts where teams prioritize flow efficiency and data-driven forecasting over upfront planning
• Related to: kanban, lean-software-development

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Planning Poker

Developers should use Planning Poker during sprint planning or backlog refinement sessions to improve estimation accuracy and team alignment

Pros

• It's particularly valuable in Scrum or other agile frameworks where relative sizing (e
• Related to: agile-methodology, scrum

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use No Estimation if: You want it is particularly useful in kanban or lean contexts where teams prioritize flow efficiency and data-driven forecasting over upfront planning and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Planning Poker if: You prioritize it's particularly valuable in scrum or other agile frameworks where relative sizing (e over what No Estimation offers.

The Bottom Line

No Estimation wins

Developers should consider No Estimation when working in fast-paced, uncertain environments where requirements change frequently, as it reduces overhead and stress associated with estimation