No Explicit Targets vs Waterfall Methodology
Developers should learn and use No Explicit Targets when working in highly volatile or innovative projects where traditional goal-setting can lead to misalignment or inefficiency, such as in startup environments, research and development, or when applying lean startup methodologies meets developers should learn and use the waterfall methodology in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems, or large-scale infrastructure where changes are costly. Here's our take.
No Explicit Targets
Developers should learn and use No Explicit Targets when working in highly volatile or innovative projects where traditional goal-setting can lead to misalignment or inefficiency, such as in startup environments, research and development, or when applying lean startup methodologies
No Explicit Targets
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use No Explicit Targets when working in highly volatile or innovative projects where traditional goal-setting can lead to misalignment or inefficiency, such as in startup environments, research and development, or when applying lean startup methodologies
Pros
- +It helps teams stay responsive to user feedback and market changes by prioritizing learning and adaptation over fixed deliverables, reducing the risk of building features that don't add value
- +Related to: agile-methodology, lean-software-development
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Waterfall Methodology
Developers should learn and use the Waterfall Methodology in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems, or large-scale infrastructure where changes are costly
Pros
- +It is suitable when regulatory compliance, detailed documentation, and predictable timelines are priorities, as it provides a structured framework for managing complex, long-term projects
- +Related to: software-development-life-cycle, project-management
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use No Explicit Targets if: You want it helps teams stay responsive to user feedback and market changes by prioritizing learning and adaptation over fixed deliverables, reducing the risk of building features that don't add value and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Waterfall Methodology if: You prioritize it is suitable when regulatory compliance, detailed documentation, and predictable timelines are priorities, as it provides a structured framework for managing complex, long-term projects over what No Explicit Targets offers.
Developers should learn and use No Explicit Targets when working in highly volatile or innovative projects where traditional goal-setting can lead to misalignment or inefficiency, such as in startup environments, research and development, or when applying lean startup methodologies
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev