No Formal Standards vs Waterfall Methodology
Developers should consider this approach when working in fast-paced, innovative projects where requirements are unclear or rapidly changing, such as in early-stage startups, research and development, or prototyping phases meets developers should learn and use the waterfall methodology in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems, or large-scale infrastructure where changes are costly. Here's our take.
No Formal Standards
Developers should consider this approach when working in fast-paced, innovative projects where requirements are unclear or rapidly changing, such as in early-stage startups, research and development, or prototyping phases
No Formal Standards
Nice PickDevelopers should consider this approach when working in fast-paced, innovative projects where requirements are unclear or rapidly changing, such as in early-stage startups, research and development, or prototyping phases
Pros
- +It allows for creative problem-solving, reduces overhead from bureaucracy, and enables teams to pivot quickly based on feedback or new insights, though it requires strong communication and self-organization to avoid chaos
- +Related to: agile-methodology, lean-development
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Waterfall Methodology
Developers should learn and use the Waterfall Methodology in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems, or large-scale infrastructure where changes are costly
Pros
- +It is suitable when regulatory compliance, detailed documentation, and predictable timelines are priorities, as it provides a structured framework for managing complex, long-term projects
- +Related to: software-development-life-cycle, project-management
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use No Formal Standards if: You want it allows for creative problem-solving, reduces overhead from bureaucracy, and enables teams to pivot quickly based on feedback or new insights, though it requires strong communication and self-organization to avoid chaos and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Waterfall Methodology if: You prioritize it is suitable when regulatory compliance, detailed documentation, and predictable timelines are priorities, as it provides a structured framework for managing complex, long-term projects over what No Formal Standards offers.
Developers should consider this approach when working in fast-paced, innovative projects where requirements are unclear or rapidly changing, such as in early-stage startups, research and development, or prototyping phases
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev