No Permissions Model vs Discretionary Access Control
Developers should consider using a No Permissions Model in scenarios where the application is intended for public, unrestricted use, such as open data platforms, educational tools, or proof-of-concept prototypes where security overhead is unnecessary meets developers should learn dac when building or securing applications that require fine-grained user-level access control, such as file-sharing systems, multi-user platforms, or enterprise software. Here's our take.
No Permissions Model
Developers should consider using a No Permissions Model in scenarios where the application is intended for public, unrestricted use, such as open data platforms, educational tools, or proof-of-concept prototypes where security overhead is unnecessary
No Permissions Model
Nice PickDevelopers should consider using a No Permissions Model in scenarios where the application is intended for public, unrestricted use, such as open data platforms, educational tools, or proof-of-concept prototypes where security overhead is unnecessary
Pros
- +It is also useful during initial development phases to avoid complexity, allowing teams to focus on core functionality before implementing access controls
- +Related to: access-control, authentication
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Discretionary Access Control
Developers should learn DAC when building or securing applications that require fine-grained user-level access control, such as file-sharing systems, multi-user platforms, or enterprise software
Pros
- +It is essential for implementing security policies where resource owners need flexibility to manage permissions, but it may not be suitable for highly regulated environments where mandatory access control is required for stricter enforcement
- +Related to: mandatory-access-control, role-based-access-control
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use No Permissions Model if: You want it is also useful during initial development phases to avoid complexity, allowing teams to focus on core functionality before implementing access controls and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Discretionary Access Control if: You prioritize it is essential for implementing security policies where resource owners need flexibility to manage permissions, but it may not be suitable for highly regulated environments where mandatory access control is required for stricter enforcement over what No Permissions Model offers.
Developers should consider using a No Permissions Model in scenarios where the application is intended for public, unrestricted use, such as open data platforms, educational tools, or proof-of-concept prototypes where security overhead is unnecessary
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev