Nominal Typing vs Duck Typing
Developers should learn nominal typing when working in languages like Java, C#, or Swift, where type safety and explicit contracts are critical, such as in enterprise applications or systems requiring strict inheritance hierarchies meets developers should learn duck typing when working in dynamically-typed languages to write more generic and reusable code that focuses on what objects can do rather than what they are. Here's our take.
Nominal Typing
Developers should learn nominal typing when working in languages like Java, C#, or Swift, where type safety and explicit contracts are critical, such as in enterprise applications or systems requiring strict inheritance hierarchies
Nominal Typing
Nice PickDevelopers should learn nominal typing when working in languages like Java, C#, or Swift, where type safety and explicit contracts are critical, such as in enterprise applications or systems requiring strict inheritance hierarchies
Pros
- +It is particularly useful for preventing accidental type mismatches in object-oriented programming, ensuring that APIs and class hierarchies are used as intended, which enhances code reliability and maintainability
- +Related to: structural-typing, type-systems
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Duck Typing
Developers should learn duck typing when working in dynamically-typed languages to write more generic and reusable code that focuses on what objects can do rather than what they are
Pros
- +It's particularly useful for creating flexible APIs, implementing design patterns like strategy or adapter, and handling diverse data structures in a uniform way, such as iterating over collections regardless of their specific type
- +Related to: dynamic-typing, polymorphism
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Nominal Typing if: You want it is particularly useful for preventing accidental type mismatches in object-oriented programming, ensuring that apis and class hierarchies are used as intended, which enhances code reliability and maintainability and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Duck Typing if: You prioritize it's particularly useful for creating flexible apis, implementing design patterns like strategy or adapter, and handling diverse data structures in a uniform way, such as iterating over collections regardless of their specific type over what Nominal Typing offers.
Developers should learn nominal typing when working in languages like Java, C#, or Swift, where type safety and explicit contracts are critical, such as in enterprise applications or systems requiring strict inheritance hierarchies
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev