Non-Inclusive UX vs Accessible Design
Developers should learn about Non-Inclusive UX to avoid creating products that inadvertently exclude users, which can lead to legal risks, reduced market reach, and ethical concerns meets developers should learn and use accessible design to comply with legal requirements (e. Here's our take.
Non-Inclusive UX
Developers should learn about Non-Inclusive UX to avoid creating products that inadvertently exclude users, which can lead to legal risks, reduced market reach, and ethical concerns
Non-Inclusive UX
Nice PickDevelopers should learn about Non-Inclusive UX to avoid creating products that inadvertently exclude users, which can lead to legal risks, reduced market reach, and ethical concerns
Pros
- +It is essential when designing for global audiences, accessibility compliance (e
- +Related to: inclusive-design, accessibility
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Accessible Design
Developers should learn and use accessible design to comply with legal requirements (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: wcag, aria
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Non-Inclusive UX if: You want it is essential when designing for global audiences, accessibility compliance (e and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Accessible Design if: You prioritize g over what Non-Inclusive UX offers.
Developers should learn about Non-Inclusive UX to avoid creating products that inadvertently exclude users, which can lead to legal risks, reduced market reach, and ethical concerns
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev