Non-Standard Practices vs Web Standards

Developers might learn about non-standard practices to understand legacy systems, troubleshoot issues in unconventional codebases, or adapt to constraints like tight deadlines or limited resources meets developers should learn and use web standards to build websites and applications that are accessible, performant, and compatible with all modern browsers and devices, which is crucial for reaching a broad audience and complying with legal requirements like the americans with disabilities act (ada). Here's our take.

Non-Standard Practices

Nice Pick

Developers might learn about non-standard practices to understand legacy systems, troubleshoot issues in unconventional codebases, or adapt to constraints like tight deadlines or limited resources

Pros

• They are relevant when working with proprietary systems, integrating disparate technologies, or in environments where standard solutions are impractical
• Related to: technical-debt, code-maintainability

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Web Standards

Developers should learn and use Web Standards to build websites and applications that are accessible, performant, and compatible with all modern browsers and devices, which is crucial for reaching a broad audience and complying with legal requirements like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Pros

• For example, using semantic HTML and CSS Grid ensures proper structure and layout, while following JavaScript ES6+ standards enables cross-browser functionality
• Related to: html, css

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Non-Standard Practices is a methodology while Web Standards is a concept. We picked Non-Standard Practices based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Non-Standard Practices wins

Based on overall popularity. Non-Standard Practices is more widely used, but Web Standards excels in its own space.