NPT vs Titanoboa

Nmap's packet whisperer meets the low-code workflow beast that doesn't make you choose between drag-and-drop simplicity and actual code. Here's our take.

NPT

Nice Pick

Nmap's packet whisperer. Turns your pcap chaos into pretty graphs and stats, because staring at raw packets is for masochists.

Pros

• Seamless integration with Nmap for analyzing scan traffic
• Generates clear visualizations and detailed reports from pcap files
• Great for debugging network issues and optimizing scan performance

Cons

• Command-line only, so no GUI for the click-happy crowd
• Limited to Nmap-related traces, not a general-purpose packet analyzer

Titanoboa

The low-code workflow beast that doesn't make you choose between drag-and-drop simplicity and actual code.

Pros

• Visual editor makes complex workflows approachable for non-developers
• Supports Python and JavaScript scripting for when you need real logic
• Open-source and free, avoiding vendor lock-in
• Handles event-driven processes and system integrations smoothly

Cons

• Can feel bloated for simple automation tasks
• Learning curve spikes when mixing visual and code-based components

The Verdict

Use NPT if: You want seamless integration with nmap for analyzing scan traffic and can live with command-line only, so no gui for the click-happy crowd.

Use Titanoboa if: You prioritize visual editor makes complex workflows approachable for non-developers over what NPT offers.

The Bottom Line

NPT wins

Nmap's packet whisperer. Turns your pcap chaos into pretty graphs and stats, because staring at raw packets is for masochists.