On-Premises Build Servers vs Cloud Build Servers

Developers should use on-premises build servers when they require full control over their build environment, need to comply with strict security or regulatory requirements, or have sensitive code that cannot be hosted externally meets developers should use cloud build servers to automate repetitive build tasks, ensure consistent environments across teams, and accelerate software delivery in agile or devops practices. Here's our take.

On-Premises Build Servers

Nice Pick

Developers should use on-premises build servers when they require full control over their build environment, need to comply with strict security or regulatory requirements, or have sensitive code that cannot be hosted externally

Pros

• They are ideal for large enterprises, government projects, or industries like finance and healthcare where data privacy is critical, as they allow customization of hardware, software, and network configurations to meet specific needs
• Related to: jenkins, teamcity

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Cloud Build Servers

Developers should use Cloud Build Servers to automate repetitive build tasks, ensure consistent environments across teams, and accelerate software delivery in agile or DevOps practices

Pros

• They are essential for projects requiring frequent integration, testing, and deployment, such as web applications, microservices, or mobile apps, as they reduce manual errors and improve collaboration
• Related to: continuous-integration, continuous-deployment

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. On-Premises Build Servers is a tool while Cloud Build Servers is a platform. We picked On-Premises Build Servers based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

On-Premises Build Servers wins

Based on overall popularity. On-Premises Build Servers is more widely used, but Cloud Build Servers excels in its own space.