Dynamic

Onchain vs Sidechains

Developers should learn about onchain concepts when building decentralized applications (dApps), smart contracts, or blockchain-based systems that require high security, auditability, and censorship resistance meets developers should learn about sidechains when building decentralized applications (dapps) that require high transaction throughput, lower fees, or specialized functionality not supported by the main blockchain. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Onchain

Nice Pick

Pros

+It is essential for use cases like DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces, and supply chain tracking, where data integrity and trust are critical
+Related to: blockchain, smart-contracts

Cons

-Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Sidechains

Developers should learn about sidechains when building decentralized applications (dApps) that require high transaction throughput, lower fees, or specialized functionality not supported by the main blockchain

Pros

+They are particularly useful for scaling solutions, such as handling microtransactions in gaming or DeFi protocols, and for testing new consensus algorithms or smart contract features in a secure, isolated environment
+Related to: blockchain, interoperability

Cons

-Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Onchain if: You want it is essential for use cases like defi protocols, nft marketplaces, and supply chain tracking, where data integrity and trust are critical and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Sidechains if: You prioritize they are particularly useful for scaling solutions, such as handling microtransactions in gaming or defi protocols, and for testing new consensus algorithms or smart contract features in a secure, isolated environment over what Onchain offers.

🧊

The Bottom Line

Onchain wins

Learn about Onchain →Learn about Sidechains →

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev