OneRoster vs cmi5

Developers should learn OneRoster when building or integrating educational software that needs to exchange student, course, or grade data, such as in edtech applications, LMS plugins, or SIS integrations meets developers should learn cmi5 when building or integrating e-learning platforms, as it ensures compatibility across different systems and content types, such as xapi-based activities. Here's our take.

OneRoster

Nice Pick

Developers should learn OneRoster when building or integrating educational software that needs to exchange student, course, or grade data, such as in edtech applications, LMS plugins, or SIS integrations

Pros

• It is essential for ensuring compliance with interoperability standards in schools and institutions, reducing custom integration work and data errors
• Related to: ims-global-standards, learning-tools-interoperability

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

cmi5

Developers should learn cmi5 when building or integrating e-learning platforms, as it ensures compatibility across different systems and content types, such as xAPI-based activities

Pros

• It is particularly useful for creating adaptive learning experiences, mobile learning apps, and corporate training solutions that require robust tracking and reporting
• Related to: scorm, xapi

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. OneRoster is a platform while cmi5 is a concept. We picked OneRoster based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

OneRoster wins

Based on overall popularity. OneRoster is more widely used, but cmi5 excels in its own space.