Open Printing vs Universal Print Driver

Developers should learn Open Printing when working on applications or systems that require printing functionality on Unix-like platforms, as it is the de facto standard printing system for Linux and macOS meets developers should learn about universal print drivers when working on system administration, it infrastructure, or software that integrates with printing systems, as it facilitates efficient device management in large-scale deployments. Here's our take.

Open Printing

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Open Printing when working on applications or systems that require printing functionality on Unix-like platforms, as it is the de facto standard printing system for Linux and macOS

Pros

• It is essential for building cross-platform software that needs to handle printing, developing printer drivers, or integrating with network printers using modern protocols like IPP
• Related to: linux-system-administration, network-printing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Universal Print Driver

Developers should learn about Universal Print Drivers when working on system administration, IT infrastructure, or software that integrates with printing systems, as it facilitates efficient device management in large-scale deployments

Pros

• It is particularly useful in scenarios where multiple printer models are used, such as in corporate offices, educational institutions, or healthcare facilities, to minimize driver conflicts and support costs
• Related to: driver-development, system-administration

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Open Printing is a platform while Universal Print Driver is a tool. We picked Open Printing based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Open Printing wins

Based on overall popularity. Open Printing is more widely used, but Universal Print Driver excels in its own space.