Object-Relational Mapping vs Dapper

Developers should learn ORM when building applications that require persistent data storage in relational databases, as it simplifies database interactions and reduces SQL-related errors meets developers should use dapper when they need fast database access with minimal abstraction, such as in high-performance web applications, microservices, or scenarios where raw sql control is preferred. Here's our take.

Object-Relational Mapping

Nice Pick

Developers should learn ORM when building applications that require persistent data storage in relational databases, as it simplifies database interactions and reduces SQL-related errors

Pros

• It is particularly useful in web development, enterprise applications, and any project where object-oriented code needs to integrate seamlessly with a database, enhancing maintainability and speeding up development cycles
• Related to: sql, database-design

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Dapper

Developers should use Dapper when they need fast database access with minimal abstraction, such as in high-performance web applications, microservices, or scenarios where raw SQL control is preferred

Pros

• It's ideal for projects requiring simple CRUD operations, complex queries, or when integrating with existing SQL-heavy codebases, as it reduces boilerplate while maintaining SQL transparency
• Related to: c-sharp, sql-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Object-Relational Mapping is a concept while Dapper is a library. We picked Object-Relational Mapping based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Object-Relational Mapping wins

Based on overall popularity. Object-Relational Mapping is more widely used, but Dapper excels in its own space.