Dynamic
P/Invoke vs COM Interop
Developers should learn P/Invoke when building meets developers should learn com interop when working on . Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
P/Invoke
Developers should learn P/Invoke when building
P/Invoke
Nice PickDevelopers should learn P/Invoke when building
Pros
- +NET applications that need to interact with native Windows APIs (e
- +Related to: csharp, dotnet-framework
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
COM Interop
Developers should learn COM Interop when working on
Pros
- +NET projects that need to interact with legacy COM-based software, such as older Windows applications, ActiveX controls, or Office automation
- +Related to: .net-framework, csharp
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use P/Invoke if: You want net applications that need to interact with native windows apis (e and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use COM Interop if: You prioritize net projects that need to interact with legacy com-based software, such as older windows applications, activex controls, or office automation over what P/Invoke offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
P/Invoke wins
Developers should learn P/Invoke when building
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev