PaaS vs Serverless

Developers should use PaaS when they need to accelerate application development and deployment by abstracting away infrastructure management, such as servers, storage, and networking meets developers should learn serverless for building scalable, cost-effective applications with minimal operational overhead, especially for event-driven workloads like apis, data processing, or iot. Here's our take.

PaaS

Nice Pick

Developers should use PaaS when they need to accelerate application development and deployment by abstracting away infrastructure management, such as servers, storage, and networking

Pros

• It is ideal for building web and mobile applications, microservices, and APIs, especially in scenarios requiring rapid prototyping, scalability, and reduced operational overhead
• Related to: cloud-computing, devops

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Serverless

Developers should learn Serverless for building scalable, cost-effective applications with minimal operational overhead, especially for event-driven workloads like APIs, data processing, or IoT

Pros

• It's ideal for microservices, sporadic traffic patterns, and rapid prototyping, as it reduces deployment complexity and optimizes costs by charging only for execution time
• Related to: aws-lambda, azure-functions

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. PaaS is a platform while Serverless is a concept. We picked PaaS based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

PaaS wins

Based on overall popularity. PaaS is more widely used, but Serverless excels in its own space.