Pac4j vs Apache Shiro

Developers should use Pac4j when building Java-based web applications that require robust, multi-protocol security without vendor lock-in, such as enterprise systems, SaaS platforms, or applications needing social login (e meets developers should learn apache shiro when building java applications that require robust security features without the complexity of larger frameworks like spring security. Here's our take.

Pac4j

Nice Pick

Developers should use Pac4j when building Java-based web applications that require robust, multi-protocol security without vendor lock-in, such as enterprise systems, SaaS platforms, or applications needing social login (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: java, spring-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Apache Shiro

Developers should learn Apache Shiro when building Java applications that require robust security features without the complexity of larger frameworks like Spring Security

Pros

• It's particularly useful for lightweight applications, legacy systems, or projects where fine-grained control over security is needed, such as custom authentication schemes or session management
• Related to: java, spring-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Pac4j is a library while Apache Shiro is a framework. We picked Pac4j based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Pac4j wins

Based on overall popularity. Pac4j is more widely used, but Apache Shiro excels in its own space.