Parity Bits vs Cyclic Redundancy Check
Developers should learn about parity bits when working with low-level systems, networking protocols, or embedded devices where basic error detection is needed, such as in serial communication (e meets developers should learn crc when working with data integrity in communication protocols (e. Here's our take.
Parity Bits
Developers should learn about parity bits when working with low-level systems, networking protocols, or embedded devices where basic error detection is needed, such as in serial communication (e
Parity Bits
Nice PickDevelopers should learn about parity bits when working with low-level systems, networking protocols, or embedded devices where basic error detection is needed, such as in serial communication (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: error-detection-and-correction, hamming-code
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Cyclic Redundancy Check
Developers should learn CRC when working with data integrity in communication protocols (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: error-detection, data-integrity
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Parity Bits if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Cyclic Redundancy Check if: You prioritize g over what Parity Bits offers.
Developers should learn about parity bits when working with low-level systems, networking protocols, or embedded devices where basic error detection is needed, such as in serial communication (e
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev