Paxos vs Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance
Developers should learn Paxos when building or working with distributed systems that require strong consistency, such as replicated state machines, distributed databases (e meets developers should learn pbft when building or working with high-assurance distributed systems, such as permissioned blockchains (e. Here's our take.
Paxos
Developers should learn Paxos when building or working with distributed systems that require strong consistency, such as replicated state machines, distributed databases (e
Paxos
Nice PickDevelopers should learn Paxos when building or working with distributed systems that require strong consistency, such as replicated state machines, distributed databases (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: distributed-systems, raft-consensus
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance
Developers should learn PBFT when building or working with high-assurance distributed systems, such as permissioned blockchains (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: distributed-systems, consensus-algorithms
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Paxos if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance if: You prioritize g over what Paxos offers.
Developers should learn Paxos when building or working with distributed systems that require strong consistency, such as replicated state machines, distributed databases (e
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev