Payload vs Sanity

Self-hosted TypeScript CMS vs the structured content platform. One you own, one you rent.

The Headless CMS Landscape

The headless CMS market is crowded. Contentful, Strapi, Sanity, Payload, Directus, Keystatic — everyone wants to manage your content.

Payload and Sanity represent two philosophies: Payload is code-first and self-hosted. Sanity is content-first and hosted. Both are excellent, but the trade-offs matter.

Payload: Your CMS, Your Rules

Payload 3.0 is a Next.js app. Your CMS admin panel lives in your Next.js project. Your content types are TypeScript configs. Your API is auto-generated.

No separate hosted service. No API keys. No "content lake" you don't control. Just your code, your database (Postgres or MongoDB), and your deployment.

The admin UI is excellent too — drag-and-drop blocks, live preview, version history, access control. It's a real CMS, not a glorified CRUD interface.

Sanity: The Content Platform

Sanity's pitch is the "Content Lake" — a hosted, real-time content backend that handles sync, CDN, and GROQ queries.

• Sanity Studio is endlessly customizable — React components for every field type • Real-time collaboration — multiple editors, no conflicts • GROQ is a genuinely good query language for content • CDN is fast and handles media assets well

For content teams that need collaboration and a polished editing experience, Sanity delivers.

The Cost Equation

Sanity's free tier is generous (100K API requests/month). But growth tier is $15/user/month + usage. A team of 10 editors with moderate traffic? $200+/month easy.

Payload is free and open source. Your only cost is hosting, which you're already paying for. On Vercel or Railway, a Payload + Postgres setup costs $5-20/month regardless of team size.

Quick Comparison

Factor	Payload	Sanity
Hosting	Self-hosted (your infra)	Hosted (Sanity cloud)
TypeScript	Native, config-as-code	Good, schema-based
Admin UI	Excellent, built-in	Sanity Studio (excellent)
Real-time Collab	Basic	Excellent
Cost	Free + hosting	$15/user/mo + usage
Next.js Integration	IS a Next.js app	SDK/plugin
Query Language	REST + GraphQL	GROQ (powerful)
Vendor Lock-in	None	High (Content Lake)

The Verdict

Use Payload if: You're a developer who wants to own the CMS stack, love TypeScript, and are already on Next.js. Payload 3.0 is a joy.

Use Sanity if: Your content team needs real-time collaboration, you want a hosted solution, or you need GROQ's powerful querying.

Consider: Keystatic is worth a look if you want file-based content (Git as CMS) with a nice editing UI.

Payload vs Sanity: FAQ

Is Payload or Sanity better?

Payload is the Nice Pick. Payload 3.0 running on Next.js is the most developer-friendly CMS I've seen. Self-hosted, TypeScript-native, and you actually own your content infrastructure. Sanity is excellent but the vendor lock-in and per-seat pricing add up.

When should you use Payload?

You're a developer who wants to own the CMS stack, love TypeScript, and are already on Next.js. Payload 3.0 is a joy.

When should you use Sanity?

Your content team needs real-time collaboration, you want a hosted solution, or you need GROQ's powerful querying.

What's the main difference between Payload and Sanity?

Self-hosted TypeScript CMS vs the structured content platform. One you own, one you rent.

How do Payload and Sanity compare on hosting?

Payload: Self-hosted (your infra). Sanity: Hosted (Sanity cloud).

Are there alternatives to consider beyond Payload and Sanity?

Keystatic is worth a look if you want file-based content (Git as CMS) with a nice editing UI.

The Bottom Line

Payload wins

Payload 3.0 running on Next.js is the most developer-friendly CMS I've seen. Self-hosted, TypeScript-native, and you actually own your content infrastructure. Sanity is excellent but the vendor lock-in and per-seat pricing add up.

Related Comparisons