Dynamic

Pear vs npm

Developers should learn and use Pear when working on legacy PHP projects or in environments where it is still in use, as it was a standard tool for PHP dependency management before Composer became dominant meets developers should learn npm because it is essential for managing dependencies in node. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Pear

Developers should learn and use Pear when working on legacy PHP projects or in environments where it is still in use, as it was a standard tool for PHP dependency management before Composer became dominant

Pear

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Pear when working on legacy PHP projects or in environments where it is still in use, as it was a standard tool for PHP dependency management before Composer became dominant

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful for installing system-wide PHP extensions or libraries that require global availability, such as PEAR packages like PHPUnit or Mail
  • +Related to: php, composer

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

npm

Developers should learn npm because it is essential for managing dependencies in Node

Pros

  • +js and front-end JavaScript projects, ensuring consistent environments and streamlined workflows
  • +Related to: node-js, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Pear if: You want it is particularly useful for installing system-wide php extensions or libraries that require global availability, such as pear packages like phpunit or mail and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use npm if: You prioritize js and front-end javascript projects, ensuring consistent environments and streamlined workflows over what Pear offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Pear wins

Developers should learn and use Pear when working on legacy PHP projects or in environments where it is still in use, as it was a standard tool for PHP dependency management before Composer became dominant

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev