Periodic Compliance Checks vs Continuous Compliance

Developers should implement Periodic Compliance Checks to mitigate risks, avoid legal penalties, and maintain trust in applications handling sensitive data meets developers should learn and implement continuous compliance when working in regulated industries (e. Here's our take.

Periodic Compliance Checks

Nice Pick

Developers should implement Periodic Compliance Checks to mitigate risks, avoid legal penalties, and maintain trust in applications handling sensitive data

Pros

• For example, in software development, this includes checking for GDPR compliance in data handling, PCI DSS standards in payment systems, or internal security policies in cloud deployments
• Related to: regulatory-compliance, security-auditing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Continuous Compliance

Developers should learn and implement Continuous Compliance when working in regulated industries (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: devsecops, ci-cd-pipelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Periodic Compliance Checks if: You want for example, in software development, this includes checking for gdpr compliance in data handling, pci dss standards in payment systems, or internal security policies in cloud deployments and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Continuous Compliance if: You prioritize g over what Periodic Compliance Checks offers.

The Bottom Line

Periodic Compliance Checks wins

Developers should implement Periodic Compliance Checks to mitigate risks, avoid legal penalties, and maintain trust in applications handling sensitive data