Pitching vs Technical Writing

Developers should learn pitching to effectively advocate for their work, whether presenting a new feature to product managers, explaining a technical solution to non-technical stakeholders, or seeking investment for a startup meets developers should learn technical writing to improve collaboration, reduce support costs, and enhance product adoption by creating documentation that helps users and other developers understand and use their software efficiently. Here's our take.

Pitching

Nice Pick

Developers should learn pitching to effectively advocate for their work, whether presenting a new feature to product managers, explaining a technical solution to non-technical stakeholders, or seeking investment for a startup

Pros

• It is crucial in agile environments for sprint reviews, in product development for user story presentations, and in entrepreneurial settings for demo days or investor meetings
• Related to: public-speaking, storytelling

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Technical Writing

Developers should learn technical writing to improve collaboration, reduce support costs, and enhance product adoption by creating documentation that helps users and other developers understand and use their software efficiently

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in roles involving open-source projects, API development, or when working in teams where clear communication of technical details is critical for success
• Related to: api-documentation, user-manuals

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Pitching is a methodology while Technical Writing is a concept. We picked Pitching based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Pitching wins

Based on overall popularity. Pitching is more widely used, but Technical Writing excels in its own space.