Dynamic
PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
Serverless MySQL with branching meets aws's database that makes you feel fancy without the price tag of oracle, but still costs more than your rent. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
PlanetScale
Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
PlanetScale
Nice PickServerless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
Pros
- +Database branching
- +Serverless
- +No downtime deploys
Cons
- -MySQL only
- -No foreign keys
- -Free tier removed
Amazon Aurora
AWS's database that makes you feel fancy without the price tag of Oracle, but still costs more than your rent.
Pros
- +Fully managed with automatic scaling, backups, and patching
- +Up to 5x MySQL and 3x PostgreSQL performance with cloud-optimized storage
- +High availability and durability through multi-AZ replication
- +MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility for easy migration
Cons
- -Can get expensive quickly with scaling and I/O costs
- -Vendor lock-in to AWS ecosystem
- -Limited to AWS regions, which might affect latency for global apps
The Verdict
Use PlanetScale if: You want database branching and can live with mysql only.
Use Amazon Aurora if: You prioritize fully managed with automatic scaling, backups, and patching over what PlanetScale offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
PlanetScale wins
Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev