Dynamic

PlanetScale vs Amazon RDS

Serverless MySQL with branching meets managed databases for people who'd rather not manage databases. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

PlanetScale

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

PlanetScale

Nice Pick

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

Pros

  • +Database branching
  • +Serverless
  • +No downtime deploys

Cons

  • -MySQL only
  • -No foreign keys
  • -Free tier removed

Amazon RDS

Managed databases for people who'd rather not manage databases. It's like having a DBA on retainer, but cheaper and less opinionated.

Pros

  • +Automates backups, patching, and scaling, so you can focus on your app instead of babysitting servers
  • +Supports multiple engines like PostgreSQL and MySQL, making it easy to switch or standardize
  • +Built-in high availability with Multi-AZ deployments, because downtime is for amateurs

Cons

  • -Costs can sneak up on you with instance sizes and storage, especially if you forget to turn things off
  • -Limited control over the underlying OS and some database settings, which can be frustrating for power users

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. PlanetScale is a databases while Amazon RDS is a hosting & deployment. We picked PlanetScale based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
PlanetScale wins

Based on overall popularity. PlanetScale is more widely used, but Amazon RDS excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev