Dynamic
PlanetScale vs Amazon RDS
Serverless MySQL with branching meets managed databases for people who'd rather not manage databases. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
PlanetScale
Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
PlanetScale
Nice PickServerless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
Pros
- +Database branching
- +Serverless
- +No downtime deploys
Cons
- -MySQL only
- -No foreign keys
- -Free tier removed
Amazon RDS
Managed databases for people who'd rather not manage databases. It's like having a DBA on retainer, but cheaper and less opinionated.
Pros
- +Automates backups, patching, and scaling, so you can focus on your app instead of babysitting servers
- +Supports multiple engines like PostgreSQL and MySQL, making it easy to switch or standardize
- +Built-in high availability with Multi-AZ deployments, because downtime is for amateurs
Cons
- -Costs can sneak up on you with instance sizes and storage, especially if you forget to turn things off
- -Limited control over the underlying OS and some database settings, which can be frustrating for power users
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. PlanetScale is a databases while Amazon RDS is a hosting & deployment. We picked PlanetScale based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
🧊
The Bottom Line
PlanetScale wins
Based on overall popularity. PlanetScale is more widely used, but Amazon RDS excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev