Dynamic
PlanetScale vs Azure Database for MySQL
Serverless MySQL with branching meets mysql with a microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
PlanetScale
Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
PlanetScale
Nice PickServerless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
Pros
- +Database branching
- +Serverless
- +No downtime deploys
Cons
- -MySQL only
- -No foreign keys
- -Free tier removed
Azure Database for MySQL
MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.
Pros
- +Fully managed with automated backups and patching
- +High availability built-in with flexible server options
- +Seamless integration with other Azure services
- +Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules
Cons
- -Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
- -Limited control over underlying infrastructure
The Verdict
Use PlanetScale if: You want database branching and can live with mysql only.
Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and patching over what PlanetScale offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
PlanetScale wins
Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev