Dynamic

PlanetScale vs Azure Database for MySQL

Serverless MySQL with branching meets mysql with a microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

PlanetScale

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

PlanetScale

Nice Pick

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

Pros

  • +Database branching
  • +Serverless
  • +No downtime deploys

Cons

  • -MySQL only
  • -No foreign keys
  • -Free tier removed

Azure Database for MySQL

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.

Pros

  • +Fully managed with automated backups and patching
  • +High availability built-in with flexible server options
  • +Seamless integration with other Azure services
  • +Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules

Cons

  • -Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
  • -Limited control over underlying infrastructure

The Verdict

Use PlanetScale if: You want database branching and can live with mysql only.

Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and patching over what PlanetScale offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
PlanetScale wins

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev