PlanetScale vs BigQuery

Serverless MySQL with branching meets google's data warehouse that makes querying petabytes feel like a casual stroll, as long as you don't mind the bill. Here's our take.

PlanetScale

Nice Pick

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

Pros

• Database branching
• Serverless
• No downtime deploys

Cons

• MySQL only
• No foreign keys
• Free tier removed

BigQuery

Google's data warehouse that makes querying petabytes feel like a casual stroll, as long as you don't mind the bill.

Pros

• Serverless architecture means zero infrastructure management
• Blazing-fast SQL queries on massive datasets with Google's distributed processing
• Built-in machine learning and seamless integration with Google Cloud services

Cons

• Costs can spiral quickly with complex queries or large data scans
• Limited control over performance tuning compared to self-managed warehouses

The Verdict

Use PlanetScale if: You want database branching and can live with mysql only.

Use BigQuery if: You prioritize serverless architecture means zero infrastructure management over what PlanetScale offers.

The Bottom Line

PlanetScale wins

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.