Dynamic
PlanetScale vs Apache Cassandra
Serverless MySQL with branching meets the distributed database that scales like a dream but queries like a nightmare. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
PlanetScale
Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
PlanetScale
Nice PickServerless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
Pros
- +Database branching
- +Serverless
- +No downtime deploys
Cons
- -MySQL only
- -No foreign keys
- -Free tier removed
Apache Cassandra
The distributed database that scales like a dream but queries like a nightmare.
Pros
- +Massive horizontal scalability with no single point of failure
- +Excellent write performance for time-series and IoT data
- +Flexible schema design that evolves without downtime
Cons
- -Complex querying with limited JOIN support
- -Steep learning curve for data modeling and tuning
The Verdict
Use PlanetScale if: You want database branching and can live with mysql only.
Use Apache Cassandra if: You prioritize massive horizontal scalability with no single point of failure over what PlanetScale offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
PlanetScale wins
Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev