Dynamic

PlanetScale vs Apache Cassandra

Serverless MySQL with branching meets the distributed database that scales like a dream but queries like a nightmare. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

PlanetScale

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

PlanetScale

Nice Pick

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

Pros

  • +Database branching
  • +Serverless
  • +No downtime deploys

Cons

  • -MySQL only
  • -No foreign keys
  • -Free tier removed

Apache Cassandra

The distributed database that scales like a dream but queries like a nightmare.

Pros

  • +Massive horizontal scalability with no single point of failure
  • +Excellent write performance for time-series and IoT data
  • +Flexible schema design that evolves without downtime

Cons

  • -Complex querying with limited JOIN support
  • -Steep learning curve for data modeling and tuning

The Verdict

Use PlanetScale if: You want database branching and can live with mysql only.

Use Apache Cassandra if: You prioritize massive horizontal scalability with no single point of failure over what PlanetScale offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
PlanetScale wins

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev