Dynamic

PlanetScale vs CockroachDB

Serverless MySQL with branching meets the cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at sql. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

PlanetScale

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

PlanetScale

Nice Pick

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

Pros

  • +Database branching
  • +Serverless
  • +No downtime deploys

Cons

  • -MySQL only
  • -No foreign keys
  • -Free tier removed

CockroachDB

The cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at SQL.

Pros

  • +Strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding
  • +PostgreSQL wire protocol compatibility for easy migration
  • +Automatic data replication and rebalancing for high availability

Cons

  • -Higher latency compared to single-node databases due to distributed overhead
  • -Complex licensing and pricing can be a headache for scaling

The Verdict

Use PlanetScale if: You want database branching and can live with mysql only.

Use CockroachDB if: You prioritize strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding over what PlanetScale offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
PlanetScale wins

Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev