Dynamic
PlanetScale vs CockroachDB
Serverless MySQL with branching meets the cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at sql. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
PlanetScale
Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
PlanetScale
Nice PickServerless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
Pros
- +Database branching
- +Serverless
- +No downtime deploys
Cons
- -MySQL only
- -No foreign keys
- -Free tier removed
CockroachDB
The cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at SQL.
Pros
- +Strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding
- +PostgreSQL wire protocol compatibility for easy migration
- +Automatic data replication and rebalancing for high availability
Cons
- -Higher latency compared to single-node databases due to distributed overhead
- -Complex licensing and pricing can be a headache for scaling
The Verdict
Use PlanetScale if: You want database branching and can live with mysql only.
Use CockroachDB if: You prioritize strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding over what PlanetScale offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
PlanetScale wins
Serverless MySQL with branching. DevOps for databases.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev