Playbooks vs Custom Tools
Developers should learn and use playbooks to automate infrastructure provisioning, configuration management, and incident handling, reducing manual errors and speeding up deployments meets developers should learn to create and use custom tools when standard tools lack necessary features, require extensive manual work, or fail to integrate seamlessly with proprietary systems. Here's our take.
Playbooks
Developers should learn and use playbooks to automate infrastructure provisioning, configuration management, and incident handling, reducing manual errors and speeding up deployments
Playbooks
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use playbooks to automate infrastructure provisioning, configuration management, and incident handling, reducing manual errors and speeding up deployments
Pros
- +They are essential in DevOps for implementing Infrastructure as Code (IaC) and in cybersecurity for orchestrating threat responses, ensuring repeatable and auditable processes
- +Related to: ansible, infrastructure-as-code
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Custom Tools
Developers should learn to create and use custom tools when standard tools lack necessary features, require extensive manual work, or fail to integrate seamlessly with proprietary systems
Pros
- +This is common in scenarios like automating deployment pipelines, processing custom data formats, or building internal dashboards for monitoring
- +Related to: scripting, automation
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Playbooks is a methodology while Custom Tools is a tool. We picked Playbooks based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Playbooks is more widely used, but Custom Tools excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev