Dynamic

Substrate vs Solidity

Developers should learn Substrate when building custom blockchains that require high flexibility, interoperability, or integration with the Polkadot ecosystem, such as for decentralized applications (dApps), enterprise solutions, or specialized networks meets developers should learn solidity to build decentralized applications (dapps), create tokens (e. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Substrate

Developers should learn Substrate when building custom blockchains that require high flexibility, interoperability, or integration with the Polkadot ecosystem, such as for decentralized applications (dApps), enterprise solutions, or specialized networks

Substrate

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Substrate when building custom blockchains that require high flexibility, interoperability, or integration with the Polkadot ecosystem, such as for decentralized applications (dApps), enterprise solutions, or specialized networks

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful for projects needing to leverage Polkadot's shared security and cross-chain capabilities, as it simplifies blockchain development with pre-built modules and a Rust-based runtime environment
  • +Related to: polkadot, rust

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Solidity

Developers should learn Solidity to build decentralized applications (dApps), create tokens (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: ethereum, smart-contracts

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Substrate is a framework while Solidity is a language. We picked Substrate based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Substrate wins

Based on overall popularity. Substrate is more widely used, but Solidity excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev