Dynamic

Polling vs GraphQL Subscriptions

Developers should use polling when building applications that require real-time or near-real-time updates but where server-push technologies like WebSockets are not feasible or necessary, such as in simple dashboards, status monitors, or legacy systems meets developers should use graphql subscriptions when building applications that require real-time functionality, such as messaging apps, live dashboards, or multiplayer games, to avoid inefficient polling and reduce latency. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Polling

Developers should use polling when building applications that require real-time or near-real-time updates but where server-push technologies like WebSockets are not feasible or necessary, such as in simple dashboards, status monitors, or legacy systems

Polling

Nice Pick

Developers should use polling when building applications that require real-time or near-real-time updates but where server-push technologies like WebSockets are not feasible or necessary, such as in simple dashboards, status monitors, or legacy systems

Pros

  • +It is suitable for low-frequency updates or scenarios with limited server resources, as it avoids the complexity of maintaining persistent connections, though it may not be optimal for high-frequency or latency-sensitive applications
  • +Related to: websockets, server-sent-events

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

GraphQL Subscriptions

Developers should use GraphQL Subscriptions when building applications that require real-time functionality, such as messaging apps, live dashboards, or multiplayer games, to avoid inefficient polling and reduce latency

Pros

  • +They are essential in scenarios where data changes frequently and clients need instant updates without manual refreshes, enhancing user experience and system efficiency
  • +Related to: graphql, apollo-server

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Polling if: You want it is suitable for low-frequency updates or scenarios with limited server resources, as it avoids the complexity of maintaining persistent connections, though it may not be optimal for high-frequency or latency-sensitive applications and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use GraphQL Subscriptions if: You prioritize they are essential in scenarios where data changes frequently and clients need instant updates without manual refreshes, enhancing user experience and system efficiency over what Polling offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Polling wins

Developers should use polling when building applications that require real-time or near-real-time updates but where server-push technologies like WebSockets are not feasible or necessary, such as in simple dashboards, status monitors, or legacy systems

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev