Post Deployment Security vs Secure By Design

Developers should learn and implement Post Deployment Security to address real-world threats that emerge after applications go live, such as zero-day exploits, configuration drift, and runtime attacks meets developers should adopt secure by design when building critical applications, such as those handling sensitive data (e. Here's our take.

Post Deployment Security

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and implement Post Deployment Security to address real-world threats that emerge after applications go live, such as zero-day exploits, configuration drift, and runtime attacks

Pros

• It is critical for maintaining compliance, protecting sensitive data, and ensuring business continuity in cloud-native, microservices, and DevOps environments where rapid deployments increase attack surfaces
• Related to: devsecops, vulnerability-management

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Secure By Design

Developers should adopt Secure By Design when building critical applications, such as those handling sensitive data (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: threat-modeling, secure-coding-practices

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Post Deployment Security if: You want it is critical for maintaining compliance, protecting sensitive data, and ensuring business continuity in cloud-native, microservices, and devops environments where rapid deployments increase attack surfaces and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Secure By Design if: You prioritize g over what Post Deployment Security offers.

The Bottom Line

Post Deployment Security wins

Developers should learn and implement Post Deployment Security to address real-world threats that emerge after applications go live, such as zero-day exploits, configuration drift, and runtime attacks