Dynamic

PostgreSQL vs SQLite

The database that actually respects your data, with more features than you'll ever need but you'll love having them anyway meets the database that lives in your pocket. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

PostgreSQL

The database that actually respects your data, with more features than you'll ever need but you'll love having them anyway.

PostgreSQL

Nice Pick

The database that actually respects your data, with more features than you'll ever need but you'll love having them anyway.

Pros

  • +Rock-solid ACID compliance and transactional integrity
  • +Rich set of built-in data types including JSON, arrays, and custom types
  • +Excellent performance with advanced indexing options like GIN and GiST
  • +Strong community support and extensive documentation

Cons

  • -Configuration can be complex and overwhelming for beginners
  • -Memory usage tends to be higher compared to some other databases

SQLite

The database that lives in your pocket. Zero servers, zero excuses.

Pros

  • +Zero-configuration setup - just drop a file and go
  • +Serverless architecture eliminates deployment headaches
  • +ACID compliance ensures data integrity without the bloat
  • +Widely supported across platforms and languages

Cons

  • -Not built for high-concurrency write-heavy workloads
  • -Limited scalability compared to client-server databases

The Verdict

Use PostgreSQL if: You want rock-solid acid compliance and transactional integrity and can live with configuration can be complex and overwhelming for beginners.

Use SQLite if: You prioritize zero-configuration setup - just drop a file and go over what PostgreSQL offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
PostgreSQL wins

The database that actually respects your data, with more features than you'll ever need but you'll love having them anyway.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev