Pre-designed Assets vs Hand Coded Components

Developers should use pre-designed assets when building projects under tight deadlines, needing polished UI/UX without extensive design work, or ensuring brand consistency across applications meets developers should use hand coded components when building projects that require minimal dependencies, fine-tuned performance, or unique design specifications not easily achievable with off-the-shelf solutions. Here's our take.

Pre-designed Assets

Nice Pick

Developers should use pre-designed assets when building projects under tight deadlines, needing polished UI/UX without extensive design work, or ensuring brand consistency across applications

Pros

• They are particularly useful for prototyping, MVP development, and non-design-focused teams to reduce development time and costs while leveraging expert-created resources
• Related to: ui-design, frontend-development

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Hand Coded Components

Developers should use Hand Coded Components when building projects that require minimal dependencies, fine-tuned performance, or unique design specifications not easily achievable with off-the-shelf solutions

Pros

• It is ideal for small to medium-sized applications, prototyping, or situations where avoiding framework bloat is critical, such as in performance-sensitive environments or legacy systems
• Related to: html, css

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Pre-designed Assets is a tool while Hand Coded Components is a methodology. We picked Pre-designed Assets based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Pre-designed Assets wins

Based on overall popularity. Pre-designed Assets is more widely used, but Hand Coded Components excels in its own space.