Protected Fields vs Public Fields
Developers should use protected fields when designing class hierarchies where subclasses need direct access to certain fields or methods for extension or modification, but those members should not be publicly accessible to maintain encapsulation and prevent misuse meets developers should use public fields when creating simple data structures like dtos (data transfer objects) or pocos (plain old clr objects) where encapsulation is not a priority, or in performance-critical scenarios where minimizing method calls is beneficial. Here's our take.
Protected Fields
Developers should use protected fields when designing class hierarchies where subclasses need direct access to certain fields or methods for extension or modification, but those members should not be publicly accessible to maintain encapsulation and prevent misuse
Protected Fields
Nice PickDevelopers should use protected fields when designing class hierarchies where subclasses need direct access to certain fields or methods for extension or modification, but those members should not be publicly accessible to maintain encapsulation and prevent misuse
Pros
- +For example, in a base class like 'Vehicle' with a field 'engineType', making it protected allows subclasses like 'Car' or 'Motorcycle' to inherit and use it while keeping it hidden from unrelated classes
- +Related to: object-oriented-programming, encapsulation
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Public Fields
Developers should use public fields when creating simple data structures like DTOs (Data Transfer Objects) or POCOs (Plain Old CLR Objects) where encapsulation is not a priority, or in performance-critical scenarios where minimizing method calls is beneficial
Pros
- +They are also common in languages like Python or JavaScript where public access is the default, but in stricter languages like Java or C#, they are generally discouraged in favor of properties or private fields with accessors to maintain control over data
- +Related to: object-oriented-programming, encapsulation
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Protected Fields if: You want for example, in a base class like 'vehicle' with a field 'enginetype', making it protected allows subclasses like 'car' or 'motorcycle' to inherit and use it while keeping it hidden from unrelated classes and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Public Fields if: You prioritize they are also common in languages like python or javascript where public access is the default, but in stricter languages like java or c#, they are generally discouraged in favor of properties or private fields with accessors to maintain control over data over what Protected Fields offers.
Developers should use protected fields when designing class hierarchies where subclasses need direct access to certain fields or methods for extension or modification, but those members should not be publicly accessible to maintain encapsulation and prevent misuse
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev