PSR-4 vs PSR-0

Developers should learn and use PSR-4 when building modern PHP applications to ensure consistent and efficient autoloading, which is essential for frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, and Composer-based projects meets developers should learn psr-0 primarily for historical context and maintaining legacy php codebases, as it was widely adopted in php 5. Here's our take.

PSR-4

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use PSR-4 when building modern PHP applications to ensure consistent and efficient autoloading, which is essential for frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, and Composer-based projects

Pros

• It eliminates the need for manual file includes, reduces boilerplate code, and facilitates better project structure by aligning namespaces with directory paths, making code more maintainable and scalable
• Related to: php, composer

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

PSR-0

Developers should learn PSR-0 primarily for historical context and maintaining legacy PHP codebases, as it was widely adopted in PHP 5

Pros

• 3+ projects before being superseded by PSR-4
• Related to: psr-4, composer

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. PSR-4 is a concept while PSR-0 is a methodology. We picked PSR-4 based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

PSR-4 wins

Based on overall popularity. PSR-4 is more widely used, but PSR-0 excels in its own space.